Bankman-Fried’s Stake in Trading Firm Raises Questions

Back in 2020, should you weren’t in crypto, you’d by no means heard of Sam Bankman-Fried, the billionaire proprietor of the FTX alternate and particularly the small quant buying and selling agency known as Alameda Research the place he’d made the beginnings of his fortune.

A 12 months later, as crypto’s market capitalization soared previous $1 trillion, $2 trillion and at last $3 trillion earlier than collapsing on the finish of the 12 months, there have been just a few hundred mentions on Google together with protection in non-crypto enterprise shops like Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal and CNBC, with just a few stops within the mainstream on the likes of Time and The New York Times after a $5 million donation to then-candidate Joe Biden’s presidential marketing campaign and advertising cope with quarterback Tom Brady and his supermodel spouse, Gisele Bündchen.

This 12 months? As his cryptocurrency alternate FTX leapfrogged Nasdaq-listed Coinbase to grow to be the second-largest crypto alternate, his title produces greater than 1.5 million hits at websites together with Politico, Vogue and New York Magazine. And Alameda Research, which as just lately as final 12 months was barely identified even contained in the crypto world, will get nearly 600,000 hits on Google.

And but, not a lot is admittedly identified about Alameda, which started by making tens of millions in 2017 off the ten% worth bonus for bitcoin in Japan. But regardless of a workers of about 30, the Bahamian agency’s affect is outsized in crypto. Bankman-Fried is assumed to personal a lot of the agency.

“It generated about $1 billion in profit last year alone, putting it on par with Wall Street mainstays, including some of the biggest traders of U.S. stocks,” Bloomberg wrote final week. And in crypto, it added, Alameda “has quickly become a force in everything from decentralized finance to venture investing and even distressed lending.”

See additionally: The Growing Ambitions of Sam Bankman-Fried, Crypto’s Would-Be King

And Bankman-Fried, along with his shock of hair and ever-present (aside from congressional testimony) khaki shorts, is overtaking bald-headed Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong because the face of crypto.

That contains Bankman-Fried’s rising concentrate on lobbying, the place he’s a much more frequent attendee of conferences on Capitol Hill than most CEOs and has been strenuously engaged on influencing the rising push to offer a regulatory framework for crypto — significantly one wherein the affect of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) sees its affect develop on the expense of the harder Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), whose chairman, Gary Gensler, has mentioned just about each cryptocurrency besides bitcoin is a safety.

Read extra: Crypto Fight on Capitol Hill Increasingly Favors CFTC

Aside from changing into the second-largest donor to Biden’s marketing campaign, Bankman-Fried has mentioned he’ll donate no less than $100 million within the 2022 election cycle, which might make him one of many largest donors, though that is from his personal pocket and he mentioned will concentrate on non-crypto insurance policies.

Alameda’s Influence

It’s nonetheless exhausting to gauge Alameda’s affect, however “concerns over potential conflicts of interest — particularly its relationship with FTX, the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency exchange” are rising, Bloomberg mentioned. “At a minimum, some say Alameda is able to benefit from a dearth of regulation, a claim that carries even more weight as Bankman-Fried strives to use his position and influence in the crypto community to shape U.S. oversight of the sector.”

FTX is having its personal rising pains — Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) mentioned the Bahamas-based and controlled alternate — which additionally has an EU license through Cyprus — is providing services and products within the U.Ok. and not using a license.

But Alameda’s place as a serious market maker on FTX, profiting on the unfold between shopping for and promoting costs, places it able to have a possible battle of curiosity with FTX, which will get its income from transaction charges and margin loans to merchants.

And whereas the agency’s executives, and Bankman-Fried, say there’s a robust firewall between the 2 — one thing that, Bloomberg appropriately notes, nobody has truly mentioned and even recommended has been breached — issues in regards to the potential for such conflicts of curiosity are rising as the scale and exercise of Alameda features extra consideration.

The Firewall

Bankman-Fried’s place because the CEO and huge proprietor of each an alternate and one among its prime market makers is one thing that largely doesn’t occur in conventional and better-regulated equities markets.

Crypto, which not a lot flippantly regulated as unregulated — or no less than unclearly regulated beneath guidelines that weren’t designed for digital property and don’t fairly match them — doesn’t have the “disclosure rules or even industry norms that discourage close ties between a market center and a trading operation have yet to develop,” Bloomberg mentioned, evaluating the state of affairs between FTX and Alameda to “the New York Stock Exchange and market-making giant Citadel Securities” sharing the identical proprietor.

That lack of regulatory readability is one thing that each Congress and the Biden Administration have been focusing closely on prior to now 12 months, even when the long-awaited Treasury Department regulatory framework proposals launched final week have been too normal and broadly written to represent a regulatory or actually, a framework proposal. And Congressional proposals just like the Responsible Financial Innovation Act from senators Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) and Cynthia Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) gained’t be handed till subsequent time period, its authors have mentioned.

In the meantime, the influence and scope of the affect and influence of Alameda — which is an enormous market maker on many different prime exchanges — is much less clear.

And FTX — which has a a lot smaller U.S. sister alternate, FTX.US — isn’t regulated within the U.S.

One huge distinction between crypto and inventory exchanges is that there are insurance policies and procedures that regulators can examine and implement, David Weisberger, co-founder of crypto buying and selling platform CoinRoutes, advised Bloomberg.

In crypto, he mentioned, “there is a clear case for having a regulator to prove that potential conflicts aren’t happening, and to stop them from happening.”

What these insurance policies and procedures are is one thing Bankman-Fried is spending increasingly money and time to affect, with a foot firmly on either side.

For all PYMNTS Crypto protection, subscribe to the day by day Crypto Newsletter.

New PYMNTS Study: How Consumers Use Digital Banks

A PYMNTS survey of two,124 US customers reveals that whereas two-thirds of customers have used FinTechs for some facet of banking companies, simply 9.3% name them their main financial institution.